i will not haggle any longer with your obvious lack of basic understanding,you keep plugging away at them simple problems and perhaps one day you will suddenly realise the point i was making was correctOriginally posted by Jaime Andrés@Sep 21 2004, 01:04 AM
Yes it does. The problem clearly states that the big Eskimo is not the father, but little Eskimo is the son of the big Eskimowell well well , i guess you missed the point that the problem also does not state that the little eskimo is the son of the big eskimo walking with him
Original questionBig Eskimo and little Eskimo were walking in the snow. Little Eskimo is Big Eskimo's son but Big Eskimo is not Little Eskimo's Father. So who is big Eskimo ?